I have not had
the opportunity to witness this principal-agent model too much because the jobs
that I worked at never really had any of these issues worth talking about
regardless of the lack of exposure to this issue I have witnessed this a couple
of years ago when I visited my uncle in Scotland and worked part time at his amusement
park. This park was divided in two parts; one part was filled with animals you
could look at and even feed some and the other half was filled with a track for
ATVs and some slides that little kids could go through. The main issue that
took place there was with people complaining that the staff was being rude to
them for not letting them either pet all of the animals or ride the ATVs faster
than what the limit was set on them. These measures were set in place as a
safety measure for everyone and the managers understood that the staff was just
doing their jobs and took our side most often although in front of the customer
they would side with them to show them that they cared. Although this
relationship worked for many years one summer when I was working at the park
there was an incident that happened. There was a change in managers over that
summer and some of them wanted to start to make the rules less restrictive because
they believe that those safety measures deterred a lot of people away from
coming to the park but a group of the old managers still supported the old
rules put in place. Well within two weeks there began to be a lot of confusion
amongst the staff regarding what to do. One of the new rules was to make the
ATVs less restricted and faster. That was a main issue for a lot of the staff
because we realized that doing that would mean it becoming less safe for the
visitors so no one really did anything with that until one day when one of the new
managers went down to the ATV area and told us to take off the restrictions
because the park was losing money since people wanted the ATVs to go faster. That
day a kid came to go on the ATVs and although we instructed him to go slow at
first in order to get a feel for the ATV and only after a while to ramp up the
speed. Well he started alright but quickly panicked and instead of hitting the
break he accidently hit the acceleration throttle making him accelerate off of
the track and into a creek that was nearby. He ended up with a broken arm,
broken leg, and some broken ribs. A helicopter had to come pick him up and take
him to the hospital because the injuries were that serious. This incident
caused a lot of stress for everyone working there because they didn’t know what
to do and what to say when the parents threatened to sue the place for being
unsafe for children. We were in trouble because we followed the orders of one
of the managers but the written rules were still the same as before in regards
to the restrictions of the ATVs. Gladly the other managers realized what had
happened and the lack of communication that was going on lead to a life
threatening incident. The manager that decided to change the rules without
going through the process was quickly terminated and the park paid the family
for the lawsuit. In this case the staff was also disciplined because it was
also our fault for listening to one of the managers without receiving a
physical change of rules or being briefed by everyone beforehand. Personally
after this incident and all of the stress it has put me through I learned to
always question things and to make sure that before I make a change to
something that it is alright with everyone else as well and before I take
orders that involve big changes such as this to make sure that I am protected
by following these changes by seeing something written or being instructed to
do so by a collective of managers.
In your title you write Principle while in your first sentence you write principal. These are two different words with different meanings. Here the correct usage is principal.
ReplyDeleteAlso, you have one big blob of text instead of several paragraphs. I wonder why. Similarly, several of your sentences run on and on. Having shorter sentences would be better. You need to edit this stuff some after you initially produce the text. Doing so shows some concern for the reader.
The story you told is interesting. Ultimately it seems that customers don't really know what they want. Ahead of time they want the thrill of riding fast. After the fact they want safety and elimination of accident risk. That tension leads to the triangle problem you describe. Other markets demonstrate something similar. For example, the subprime mortgages that were issued a decade ago to borrowers who had poor credit ratings and who were taking out loans equal to the purchase price of the house offers an interesting parallel.
A big deal issue is whether the market can self-regulate on this. It matters for that about who ultimately bears the risk. From your story it sounded like the owners of the amusement park bore at least some of the risk, by making a payment to the family of the kid in accident. Under that circumstance, perhaps they will have the diligence in the future to prevent rogue managers from relaxing the safety rules.
One other point. I didn't know what ATVs were. So I Googled it and see they are all terrain vehicles. The first time you used the acronym, you should write out fully what it stands for.
I think that the scenario that you brought up was extremely interesting because the moral hazard was in a way a legal one as well. I'm sure many amusement parks are posed with these same issues with their regulations, but I always assumed that these regulations were necessary for legality reasons. Clearly with the negative backlash that the park received from the community and family the regulations were important.
ReplyDeleteOverall I think that this was an interesting take on the principal-agent problem that I think would be unique to the rest of the class.
I think the new management was a bit foolish to ease up on the regulations, and in any corporate situation I can see this causing a triangle-like scenario. Not everyone is going to be on-board with making a situation more dangerous.
ReplyDeleteTaking the speed restrictions off of the ATV's is dangerous and it should not have been allowed. Can you imagine if safety regulations weren't being enforced at an amusement park, it would get shut down instantly. I think this company should be investigated by someone and potentially shut down for putting lives in danger to make a few extra bucks.